The top performing and performance of schools for the June 2012 Architects Licensure Examination (ALE) is available here, officially released by the PRC. It is also known as the lists of June 2012 Architects Board Exam Top Performing Schools or June 2012 Architects Board Exam Performance of the Schools.
Results of June 2012 Architects Licensure Examination:
The top performing school in the June 2012 Architects Licensure Examinationas per Commission Resolution No. 2010-547 series of 2010:
WITH 50 OR MORE EXAMINEES AND AT LEAST 80% PASSING PERCENTAGE
Rank | School | Total No. of Exam | Total No. of Passed | Percentage Passed
1 | UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS | 50 | 42 |84.00%
------------------NOTHING FOLLOWS --------------------------------
The performance of schools in the June 2012 Architects Licensure Examination (ALE) in alphabetical order as per R.A. 8981 otherwise known as PRC Modernization Act of 2000 Section 7(m) To monitor the performance of schools in licensure examinations and publish the results thereof in a newspaper of national circulation” is as follows: (Any discrepancy in the report is not intentional on the part of the Commission, but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees themselves. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction.)
Any discrepancy in the performance of schools listed above is entirely unintentional on the part of the Professional Regulation Commission but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees themselves in the application forms. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction
WITH 50 OR MORE EXAMINEES AND AT LEAST 80% PASSING PERCENTAGE
Rank | School | Total No. of Exam | Total No. of Passed | Percentage Passed
1 | UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS | 50 | 42 |84.00%
------------------NOTHING FOLLOWS --------------------------------
The performance of schools in the June 2012 Architects Licensure Examination (ALE) in alphabetical order as per R.A. 8981 otherwise known as PRC Modernization Act of 2000 Section 7(m) To monitor the performance of schools in licensure examinations and publish the results thereof in a newspaper of national circulation” is as follows: (Any discrepancy in the report is not intentional on the part of the Commission, but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees themselves. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction.)
Any discrepancy in the performance of schools listed above is entirely unintentional on the part of the Professional Regulation Commission but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees themselves in the application forms. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction
Please always visit philboardresults.blogspot.com for more updates in June 2012 Architects Licensure Examination.
Keep updated by "LIKING" us on Facebook or TWEET and GOOGLE +1 for free updates
